UK Financial Services Executives Call For Harmonised Regulatory Environment

  • 93% of UK FS executives say harmonised regulatory environment in the EU is vital
  • Anti-Money Laundering (AML) tops list for regulation affecting UK businesses
  • Regulatory compliance drives demand for senior skills – raising compliance budgets for 53% of UK businesses

Faced with a barrage of different financial regulations, including Anti-Money Laundering (AML), anti-corruption requirements, privacy regulation and Basel III, the vast majority of UK financial services CFOs and COOs (93%) believe that a harmonised regulatory environment within the European Union is important to the operational well-being of their businesses.  Ninety-two per cent believe a single environment is important across Eurozone (common currency) countries, while 88% think it is important globally, finds new research from Robert Half Financial Services.

When asked which global regulation has had the most significant impact on their business over the past six months, UK finance professionals cited AML, disclosure or reporting requirements and privacy requirements as their top three areas.

200 UK CFOs/CFOs were asked, ’Which three of the following global regulations have had the most significant impact on your business’. Their responses:

Anti-Money Laundering 42%
Disclosure or reporting requirements 35%
Privacy requirements 33%
Anti-corruption requirements 32%
Basel III 22%
Sanction requirements 17%
IFRS 13%
FATCA 11%
Turner Report (FSA) 7%
SOX, JSOX or equivalent 5%
Dodd-Frank Act 3%
MIFID 2 2%

 

The need to meet demand for so many areas of regulatory change is driving demand for senior finance professionals with the right skills to ensure their organisations are compliant.  This has led to a rise in compliance budgets for more than half (53%) of UK businesses over pre-2008 budgets, with a further 37% reporting that they have maintained the same expenditure.

200 UK CFOs/CFOs were asked:

Compared to pre-2008, has your compliance budget, including capital expenditure and labour costs increased, decreased or stayed the same?

 

Increase 53%
Decrease 10%
Stay the same 37%

Neil Owen, Global Practice Director, Robert Half Financial Services said: “We have noticed a significant increase in demand from organisations to bring the right talent on board to help them stay ahead of the regulation tsunami.  Some companies are bringing on permanent senior professionals; others are turning to seasoned project regulatory specialists with the requisite knowledge and experience to oversee key initiatives.  It’s not surprising that so many financial executives believe it is important to harmonise all of these areas of regulatory compliance, which has become such a huge element of their day-to-day role and that is driving up costs for the majority of businesses.

About Robert Half

Robert Half is the world’s first and largest specialised recruitment consultancy and member of the S&P 500. Founded in 1948, the company has over 350 offices worldwide and more than 20 in the United Kingdom providing temporary, interim and permanent recruitment solutions for accounting and finance, financial services, technology, human resources, marketing and administrative professionals. Named one of the Sunday Times’ 100 Best Companies to Work For, Robert Half offers workplace and job seeker resources here and on Twitter.

Read More

Demand for Interims within Financial Services increases in wake of controversy

Following a succession of scandals, there is no doubt the City is in a precarious position, but research indicates temporary vacancies within Financial Services are up by 6.9%.

Despite recent press that suggests opportunities within the sector are decreasing, The Venn Index – a quarterly report which provides an overview of vacancy levels and in-demand skills across the UK – has found the Interim market had a healthier 2nd quarter than possibly predicted. Although vacancies across all sectors are 4% down on quarter one, the Financial Services Industry enjoyed a rise of almost 7%, all eyes are now going to be on the 3rd quarter results.

It’s no secret there has been negative publicity surrounding the UK’s banking system in recent months and Libor, Vickers and the PPI fiasco have contributed to the current state of affairs.

In light of these recent events, experienced change management professionals are being drafted in to work on projects to streamline businesses and restore public confidence. Interims are in an ideal position to clean up organisations’ internal affairs because of their impartiality. Mismanagement and corruption may be hard to establish on the inside, but experienced, un-biased contractors are able to implement strategies to encourage an upturn in performance without the commitment of lengthy contracts.

Institutions are concentrating on projects within IT, HR and PR departments with a focus on crisis strategies and damage limitation programmes. We have found that hot areas are asset management, regulation, risk, and compliance. There is particular demand for financial controllers, performance analysts, and senior business controllers to assess how businesses are performing financially and put in place systems to make organisations more efficient. Professionals with a strong background in effective financial management are being snapped up quickly and can command good rates.  

The culture of banking in the UK has been called into disrepute, and change is needed to restore faith amongst domestic customers. The current situation is far from ideal – but it offers the opportunity for ambitious professionals to work on significant projects within a major financial centre of the world.

Venn Group, the specialist provider of temporary and interim staff across the UK. Robert has over twelve years experience of managing recruitment teams within the financial services sector.

To see Venn Group opportunities please click here.

Read More

How has the Euro Crisis affected the Recruitment Market?

In the current economic climate it is clear that many factors of people’s lives are being effected with one of the most directly hit being employment.  In 2011, we saw a steady rise in unemployment in the UK – however, interestingly, some industry sectors actually invested more resources in to employing and training staff during this period – especially in areas such as financial services; it is believed that this is due to the uncertainty that surrounds money markets and foreign currency exchange.

On the continent many individuals and families have been affected, especially in the more obvious of the hotspots, Greece and Spain, where unemployment figures are out of control and the single currency has become very weak. Many professionals believe that it is only a matter of time before the problems in the rest of Europe have a direct impact on us in the UK. One of the main issues is that the Eurozone is the UK’s biggest trading partner, with almost 50% of our exports going to the Eurozone in 2011. As European economies, such as Greece, Italy and Spain, have continued to see decline and economic unrest, there is a clear expectation that there will be less demand for UK services and products with an undoubted knock-on effect on employment, especially in manufacturing verticals.

Furthermore, the problems within the Eurozone have caused a nosedive in confidence amongst business owners and managers with a strong disinclination to take risks with such high degree of uncertainty in the markets. This means that there is a lack of new opportunities being generated and a lack of investment being put into current employees, which, of course, is bad news for the younger workers and graduates looking for employment and development.

However, this isn’t the case in all industries.  Several recruitment specialists are observing a trend for companies to “hoard” their skilled work force, with many holding on to their most capable workers in the hope that the upturn is not too far away. They are confident that the cost of keeping on and paying those staff is preferable to letting them go and then having to pay the cost of recruitment and training once the economy has improved.  It’s fair to say, therefore, that whatever the economic situation a high quality candidate will always be in demand.

At City Jobs, we have over 14 years’ experience in the industry, bringing the most demanding clients and the highest quality candidates together consistently and successfully.  Visit us today to ensure you’re being seen by the right people.

Read More

What are your employment law rights? Part Two- holiday entitlement, notice periods and poor performance

 Holiday entitlement

You are entitled to a minimum of 5.6 weeks paid holiday each year (equal to 28 days including Bank Holidays). You must take holidays when it is convenient with your employer. There is no absolute right to take the holiday times of your choosing.

You cannot decide to take payment in lieu of holiday unless your employment has terminated in which case you are entitled to any accrued but untaken holiday for that year. Your employer may stipulate that your remaining annual leave is to be taken during your notice period, assuming you are working this or on garden leave.

If you are sick during a pre-booked holiday, new case law (and forthcoming legislation) provides that you may in some circumstances be able to claim back the holiday time for the period that you were sick and even roll that extra time into next year’s holiday allowance.

 Notice periods

You are entitled to one week’s minimum notice if you have been employed for less than two years and one week per years of service if you are employed for two years and over. This week per year entitlement continues up to a maximum of 12 weeks. 

The only situation in which you would not be entitled to any notice is if you committed a repudiatory breach of contract (i.e. gross misconduct). In these circumstances, you could be what is called “summarily dismissed” (legitimately dismissed without notice). 

Poor Performance

Poor performance is essentially an allegation by your employer that your work is not up to scratch. You may be missing sales or other business targets set by your employer, or you could be making mistakes in your work. Capability is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. In order for a dismissal to be fair, however, your employer must also demonstrate that they have followed a fair procedure.

Before a formal disciplinary procedure gets underway, your employer should ideally address performance issues informally if possible, and such initial discussions would not usually appear on your disciplinary record.

The ACAS code of practice provides guidance for employers to ensure that performance issues are dealt with fairly at work, although your employer will often have their own specific policies (which should be no less than what is recommended by the ACAS code). Although the ACAS code is not legally binding, whether or not your employer abides by the ACAS code will be a factor which Employment Tribunals consider when determining whether a performance dismissal is fair. An employment tribunal can impose an uplift in damages you are awarded against your employer as a penalty for not following the Code.

The usual process for poor performance is for your employer to give a first and then final written warning before you are dismissed. You should also be given an opportunity to improve and are entitled to reasonable notice and sufficient evidence to be provided to you at disciplinary meetings. You are also entitled to appeal any disciplinary action.

Click here for more information about poor performance

 

Philip Landau who is an employment law solicitor and partner at London firm Landau Zeffertt Weir Solicitors is pleased to give cityjobs.com users a free initial consultation on any UK employment matter.

If you have a specific enquiry or require further information in relation to your employment law rights, please click here to submit your enquiry to Philip or call him on 020 7357 9494.

Read More

What are your employment law rights?

By Philip Landau, employment lawyer and partner at Landau Zeffertt Weir Solicitors

Over the next few weeks we will be publishing a series of articles on various aspects of employment law rights. This, the first of the series, will cover contracts of employment and discrimination.

Contracts of Employment

There is no legal requirement for your employer to provide you with a written employment contract. Your employer must, however, provide you with a written statement of employment terms within two months of your start date. This written statement should include details such as remuneration, terms and conditions regarding working hours, holiday pay, sick pay, notice periods etc.

The law implies duties into employment contracts. You as an employee are bound to provide faithful service to your employer, obey reasonable orders and exercise reasonable skill and care. In return, an employer has a duty to provide work and pay wages accordingly, provide a safe system of work and maintain the relationship of trust and confidence which exists between employer and employee.

Collective agreements are relatively rare. They tend to be most used in the public sector, or in industries such as manufacturing where unions are heavily utilised.

If your employer wants to change your contractual terms, they generally will need to do so by mutual agreement.

Discrimination

Discrimination is governed by The Equality Act 2010. This Act prohibits discrimination on the grounds such as age, sex, disability, pregnancy, race and religion. This is not an exhaustive list.

There are two types of discrimination, direct and indirect. Direct discrimination occurs when you are treated less favorably than someone else because of e.g. your sex and indirect discrimination is where a provision or practice is applied across the board which disadvantages e.g. women more than men. There is generally no defence to direct discrimination unless for instance it is an occupational requirement to be male (e.g. for an acting role). When it comes to indirect discrimination, an employer may have a defence that this is a requirement of the business (e.g. there have been cases where women are required to wear skirts to work which have been upheld because there is a reciprocal obligation on men to wear shirts and ties).

Unlike a claim for unfair dismissal (please see below), discrimination does not require a minimum qualifying period of employment. In fact, you can make a discrimination claims even as a prospective candidate. You have 3 months less one day from the alleged discriminatory act complained of to bring a discrimination claim at Tribunal.

Harassment is also unlawful under the Equality Act. This covers situations were an employer engages in conduct which creates an intimidating and degrading atmosphere for you in the workplace.

Click here for further information on discrimination

Philip Landau who is an employment law solicitor and partner at London firm Landau Zeffertt Weir Solicitors is pleased to give CityJobs.com users a free initial consultation on any UK employment matter.

 If you have a specific enquiry or require further information in relation to your employment law rights, please email Philip at pl@lzwlaw.co.uk or call him on 020 7357 9494.

DISCLAIMER
The information and any commentary on the law on this web site is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying upon it, is assumed by either Jobsite or Landau Zeffertt Weir. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a solicitor about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site.

 

Read More